Never before has an affair seemed more
nonsensical. The connection between the protagonists is completely devoid of
any passionate chemistry and the overall story lacks any highly palatable stakes.
Dealing with the fallout of two rich people as they engage in an affair for no real personal reasons such as a lack of martial affection, financial distress or overall boredom with their lives; is painful. Not that any reason would suffice, in terms of justification, it would at least provide a motivation for the betrayal.
Dealing with the fallout of two rich people as they engage in an affair for no real personal reasons such as a lack of martial affection, financial distress or overall boredom with their lives; is painful. Not that any reason would suffice, in terms of justification, it would at least provide a motivation for the betrayal.
There are quite a few homages to the 2002 film “Unfaithful”
but unlike that movie, there are no steamy romps to fall back on (this is
network TV). The thing that made that film tick, besides the raunchy hook-ups, was
the looming consequences. It was an affair breed out of pure lust and the
yearning to see the wife, at the center of the debauchery, reap what she’d
sowed, was a driving force in the story.
On “Betrayal” the lead characters,
Sara (Hannah Ware) and Jack (Stuart Townsend) are painted with the desperate
brushstrokes of empathy. The sympathy, by which they are presented, doesn’t
have any basis in reason. Instead, it’s clearly being done in the hopes of
having the audience feel the same. They don’t want the characters to get their hands
dirty, which is impossible with the subject matter at play.
The spouses that will suffer as a result of the affair
aren’t being fleshed out in any particularly sympathetic manner either. They
seem to be a second thought. Another thing that made “Unfaithful” work was
Richard Gere’s portrayal of the devoted husband.
Where is the man, the audience is invested in hoping won’t find out or be damaged by the resulting fallout? Besides being sympathized with automatically, there is no effort being spent in developing, Sarah’s husband past that point.
Where is the man, the audience is invested in hoping won’t find out or be damaged by the resulting fallout? Besides being sympathized with automatically, there is no effort being spent in developing, Sarah’s husband past that point.
One redeeming attribute of the
series is James Cromwell’s scion of industry character, Thatcher, who is also
Jack’s father-in-law. Albeit the machinations of the rich and powerful are
nothing new, Cromwell’s portrayal adds an edge of tension the show desperately
needs. With no personal stakes or investment, there is nothing to feel
“betrayed” by with this series, except the lost potential it had.
Episodes Aired: 4
See It or Free It: See
It; as it stands now this is entertaining enough to see it to its
conclusion, which is 9 episodes away (if the season order is aired). The alluring notion of an assured
beginning, middle and end, is too tempting an offer to resist.
Comments
Post a Comment