Vikings returned
with a vengeance...literally. Picking up right where it left off at the end of
season 3, Ragnar, Lagertha, and Rollo were all put in a position
to exact revenge in "A Good Treason," and how they chose to respond rather shocking. Let’s back up a little bit, though, and address
the premiere’s other developments. The episode opened with a bedridden Ragnar
dreaming of Valhalla, which he was mightily excited to cross over to before awakening in the land of the living.
Despite the ominous nature of his dream, Rags appeared to be on the road to making a full recovery. Not so thrilled by this development was Aslaug, who Rags’ has grown mightily suspicious of. Whether its paranoia or she really wants the throne of Kattegat for herself remains to be seen. She was certainly frosty to her husband, and after her fling with the supernatural stranger last season, one could conclude her loyalties to Ragnar are tenuous at best.
Despite the ominous nature of his dream, Rags appeared to be on the road to making a full recovery. Not so thrilled by this development was Aslaug, who Rags’ has grown mightily suspicious of. Whether its paranoia or she really wants the throne of Kattegat for herself remains to be seen. She was certainly frosty to her husband, and after her fling with the supernatural stranger last season, one could conclude her loyalties to Ragnar are tenuous at best.
One pair’s loyalty not nearly as in question is Lagertha and Kalf's, whose bond grew even stronger over the course of the hour when he moved
to make Lagertha his co-ruler. This expectedly ruffled the feathers of those
who made his ascension possible, and Kalf put their rebellion down in a bloody
reprisal wherein Lagertha joined in taking a personal and over-the-top
retribution against her enemy.
Back in Kattegat, Bjorn (acting in his role as a temporary ruler) had Floki arrested for Athelstan’s
murder. A decision that put Ragnar in the unforeseen and undesired position of having to make
his vengeance a public matter instead of the privately dispensed justice he
had in mind for his ex-friend. Bjorn’s decision drove a wedge between father
and son. By episode’s end, the younger Lothbrok had decided to rough it in
the wilderness throughout the winter to prove his worthiness as his father's heir.
Over in Paris, Rollo wed the highly resistive Gisla.
Despite acting against her protestations when it came to their nuptials, he respected
her desire not to consummate the marriage. But if you thought we were seeing a more civil side of Rollo, he certainly dispelled that notion by the time the
episode ended; as he led a brutal retaliation against the Viking settlers
who’d announced their concerns about his leadership and loyalties to the Franks.
Rollo’s behavior was similar to that of his brother and what made his decision particularly shocking was how out of character it was. For the past 3 seasons, Rollo has been portrayed only acting out in violence when he’s gone berserk or been high on shrooms. He’s not someone who methodically carries out a plot. So his capacity for cold-blooded calculation was startling to see.
Rollo’s behavior was similar to that of his brother and what made his decision particularly shocking was how out of character it was. For the past 3 seasons, Rollo has been portrayed only acting out in violence when he’s gone berserk or been high on shrooms. He’s not someone who methodically carries out a plot. So his capacity for cold-blooded calculation was startling to see.
Loyalty and revenge were the main themes of the hour, and the
premiere supplied a lot of action for the rest of the season to wade through. How
will Ragnar deal with Rollo? Was Ragnar’s dream a huge anvil hinting at his
imminent demise? Is Porunn gone for good? Will Bjorn survive winter and finally
earn his father’s trust? And perhaps the grimmest question of all, what exactly
does Ragnar have in store for Floki? Given this is who carried out the grotesque "blood eagle," does anyone really want to know the answer? Thank
goodness for the fast-forward button.
Let’s start with Spencer, who learned that her mother may be sick again from
the info Caleb hacked from Yvonne’s phone. It turns out the rival campaign
knows about Mrs. Hastings’ health issues and is planning to drop the
potentially bid-ending info when it will do the most damage.
There are two
things that are very confusing about this plot point. Firstly, when Spencer
read the medical report, it said that her mother’s tests had returned “normal.”
so why is she convinced she has relapsed? Has Mrs. Hastings’ cancer returned, or was she concerned it had, and it turned out to be a false alarm? Or had she relapsed and is already in remission? This is very hard to pinpoint.
Secondly, why did Spencer decide against giving her mother the heads up on what her opponent’s camp knows? It makes no sense. Why does she want her mother to invest more in the fantasy? She has a shot when it is going to be pulled out from under her and Spencer could have cushioned the blow? The confusing level of her logic was downright headache-inducing.
Next, we have Emily, who is convinced her eggs were stolen by new ‘A’ (B?), despite the nurse at the clinic making no mention that her donation had gone missing. In fact, the nurse indicated the exact opposite that all of the samples were accounted for and determined to have been destroyed. Either Emily has very little faith in the clinic and does not believe they would notice if her eggs went missing or completely lost them. Right now, it is looking like the latter.
Secondly, why did Spencer decide against giving her mother the heads up on what her opponent’s camp knows? It makes no sense. Why does she want her mother to invest more in the fantasy? She has a shot when it is going to be pulled out from under her and Spencer could have cushioned the blow? The confusing level of her logic was downright headache-inducing.
Next, we have Emily, who is convinced her eggs were stolen by new ‘A’ (B?), despite the nurse at the clinic making no mention that her donation had gone missing. In fact, the nurse indicated the exact opposite that all of the samples were accounted for and determined to have been destroyed. Either Emily has very little faith in the clinic and does not believe they would notice if her eggs went missing or completely lost them. Right now, it is looking like the latter.
Then there is Hanna and Aria. Hanna’s close moment with Caleb
ended up inducing a flashback that gave viewers a glimpse into what drove the lovebirds apart. Apparently, an alienated Caleb wanted to spend more time
outside feeding cats, and Hanna was not as open to that so he accused her of
losing herself in the image-obsessed fashion world and walked off. In all seriousness,
Caleb felt ignored by Hanna at her business event, resulting in a tiff that
made him walk away. Whether this was the sole impetus for their breakup is
unclear. It was clear that explaining what drove them apart is rather
contrived because it makes no sense they would’ve broken up in the first place.
As for Aria, she continued to be fidgety whenever there was
a mention of her parents’ plans to remarry. Seriously, what is up with her
strange reaction to her parents’ reunion? She has no reason to object, and her response
has been like that of someone who has become aware that an abusive relationship has resumed,
which it hasn’t. Ezra’s big secret turned out to be his knowledge of the Montgomerys’ covert reunion, and when he divulged this to her, Aria looked like she was going
to be sick…again. Maybe she was upset by all of the night’s frustrating plot
developments.
As exasperating as this episode was, it did boast a silver
lining with another appearance by Mona. She’s been on two weeks in a row (thank
goodness), and it turns out she might’ve been acting as Spencer’s guardian
angel, not that Miss Hastings will ever believe her. Mona has a good side. She’s
demonstrated it in previous seasons, and it’s nice to see the show finally
exploring it again.
Red ended up coming through in a major way, covering for Tom’s heist by
having the jewelry store owner claim he was working for them undercover. It was
a clever resolution made all the more surprising by Red's involvement.
Liz’s contempt for her maybe-dad rapidly faded after she learned that. What Liz failed to do
in the course of their argument beforehand was really stand up for Tom.
Every time Red bashes him, she doesn’t ask him what more Tom can
do to prove himself or why he is still holding this grudge. Tom’s risked his
life to save hers many times, and he went above and beyond to clear her name. What else does
Red want or need to finally let him off the hook?
Over on the procedural side of things was a villain heavily reminiscent of “General
Hospital’s” Franco: a lethal and deranged artist on a rampage. Red dealt with
him rather swiftly and, in the process, uncovered a spooky painting of Liz at a grave,
which was the apparent motive behind him naming this particular Blacklister.
Making
the painting even creepier was that Liz’s mother might’ve commissioned it. All
in all, “Drexel (No. 113)” was an eventful episode that continued the momentum
“The Blacklist” has been experiencing throughout the season, and it kept a vital character alive - a veritable win, win.
Photo Credit: "Vikings"/History Channel, "Pretty Little Liars"/Freeform/ABC Family, "The Blacklist"/NBC
Photo Credit: "Vikings"/History Channel, "Pretty Little Liars"/Freeform/ABC Family, "The Blacklist"/NBC
Comments
Post a Comment